Existing Workflow Mapping in Healthcare Setting
The previous workflow has low compliance software, leading to data inconsistency and data breaches. Moreover, the manual recording of patient data strains the clinical staff due to overload and impacts the quality standards of patient care (Dunn Lopez et al., 2021). The implementation of EHR helps in overcoming the challenges associated with inefficient workflow. The low infrastructure leads to poor quality patient care, human-led clinical errors, and data violations. Additionally, the lack of communication between healthcare professionals also impacts health outcomes.
The previous system described that patients arrive at healthcare settings, get treated for their healthcare needs, and data is recorded manually. The unavailability of past health information renders the treatment ineffective, and the patient’s condition may worsen. Hence, introducing EHR in the healthcare setting checks for data inconsistency and avoids the related clinical errors (Avendano et al., 2022). The post-implemented system has appropriate infrastructure that reduces data duplication due to the same name. For instance, EHR uses the registration number instead of a patient name, which identifies the patient and is considered a value-added step (Fortman et al., 2020). However, the data entered by unnecessary healthcare professional leads to time wasted, a non-value-added step in EHR implementation. It makes the system sluggish and disrupts the workflow in the organization.
Healthcare professional accountability leads to inadequate patient care and reduces health outcomes. EHR technology assists the professional in reviewing the patient’s medical history. Also, they are aware of adverse drug reactions that alert the staff to be cautious before administering medications (Basil et al., 2022). After analyzing any significant adverse effects, the patient will be provided with appropriate medication that enhances the patient’s health outcomes.
Cyberattacks and data breaches jeopardize patient health in the healthcare setting. Safeguarding patient information is crucial to maintain patient satisfaction, so EHR implementation using blockchain technology enhances the interoperability of databases. It also increases authorized access to patient data among professionals (Han et al., 2022). Blockchain technology will improve the organization’s performance as it increases data privacy by adhering to HIPAA rules, considered a value-added step. EHR implementation enhances professional capabilities by providing quality care on time and reducing healthcare costs.
Summary: Final Recommendations and Conclusions
All stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and administrative and IT staff, must support EHR implementation. It is essential for the healthcare setting to address their respective issues and involve them in the decision-making process. The needs analysis also assesses the organization’s unique requirements and the capabilities of the EHR system. The EHR system streamlines the workflows of organizations and is user-friendly to use. Additionally, consumers should receive training to effectively use the system. In conclusion, EHR systems should be safeguarded by security measures to maintain patient data privacy in the healthcare organization.
Healthcare organizations’ performance improved after implementing EHR technology as it enhanced patient health standards and reduced costs. Monitoring the data points helps in evaluating the organization’s performance. Patient survey rating provides feedback that helps the organization go to great lengths to improve patient satisfaction. Additionally, the leader’s role in the change management process also helps enhance the organization’s performance. The workflow after EHR implementation will assist the organization’s smooth workflow transition and enhance patient data privacy by adhering to confidentiality and security regulations. The ultimate goal of the quality improvement project plan is to enhance patient health outcomes, leading to financial success in the organization.
References
Avendano, J. P., Gallagher, D. O., Hawes, J. D., Boyle, J., Glasser, L., Aryee, J., & Katt, B. M. (2022). Interfacing with the electronic health record (EHR): A comparative review of modes of documentation. Cureus, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26330
Beauvais, B., Kruse, C., Fulton, L., Shanmugam, R., Ramamonjiarivelo, Z., & Brooks, M. (2020). Electronic health record vendors: An evaluation of the association with hospital financial and quality performance (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4).&nb
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!